P. Hjorth
To Win
S. Slump
To Win
Stijn Slump vs Daniel-Andrea Rodriguez-Redondo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W W L W W L
Form
W L L W L W L W L LHead-To-Head: Slump 1 - 0 Rodriguez-Redondo
They have played 2 sets in total, with Slump winning 2 and Rodriguez-Redondo winning 0. The last match between Slump and Rodriguez-Redondo was at the Greece F9 (Heraklion), 13-11-2017, Q2 round, Hard with Stijn Slump getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Stijn Slump | 1 |
| Daniel-Andrea Rodriguez-Redondo | 0 |
Greece F9 (Heraklion)(13-11-2017)
| Slump | Stats | Rodriguez-Redondo |
|---|---|---|
| 55% (11-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-1) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 540 | Ranking | N/A |
| 505 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 26 | Age | 41 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 2 | Titles | 0 |
| 59% (123-85) | Career Total W/L | 42% (37-52) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cirstea VS Baptiste PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Avanesyan VS Dolehide PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Slump VS Rodriguez-Redondo H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 6-3 | |||||
Slump VS Rodriguez-Redondo H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Stijn Slump Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Daniel Michalski
Player
Stijn Slump
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Marlon Vankan
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Alvaro Peiro Serrano
48%
(
30 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
50 of
70)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gabriel Ghetu
Player
Stijn Slump
75%
(
85 of
114)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
95)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
41%
(
47 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
106
|
6-4 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Emilien Demanet
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
100%
(
23 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
3 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Diego Barreto Sanchez
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
7
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
93%
(
27 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Dali Blanch
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
52
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
Player
Stijn Slump
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
85%
(
17 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
11 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
20 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fabrizio Andaloro
Player
Stijn Slump
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Yaroslav Demin
48%
(
13 of
27)
1st Serve %
58%
(
19 of
33)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
14 of
19)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
36
Total Points Won
24
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel-Andrea Rodriguez-Redondo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-4 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (123/85) | Win/Loss | 42% (37/52) |
| 58% (275/196) | Sets Win/Loss | 41% (78/112) |
| 54% (2352/2021) | Games Win/Loss | 45% (738/902) |
| 55% (24/20) | Hard Win/Loss | 44% (20/25) |
| 61% (99/63) | Clay Win/Loss | 39% (15/23) |
| 0% (0/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 515 | Aces Total | 14 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.02 |
| 417 | Total Double Faults | 16 |
| 1:10:16 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 304.48 | Average Opponent Rank | 257.45 |
| 55% (4988/9126) | 1st Serve % | 61% (217/358) |
| 70% (3488/4988) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (112/217) |
| 52% (2143/4138) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (50/141) |
| 43% (416/957) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 61% (14/23) |
| 40% (3720/9233) | Return Points Win % | 39% (121/307) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (4/8) | Challenger W/L | 33% (2/4) |
| 61% (119/77) | Futures W/L | 42% (35/48) |
| 59% (123/207) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 41% (36/88) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (22/46) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 38% (6/16) |
| 48% (26/54) | Deciding Set Win % | 62% (8/13) |
| 89% (125/111) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 97% (34/33) |
| 11% (125/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 3% (34/1) |
| 14% (83/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 7% (55/4) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
